Nigeria’s dispute with Binance is gradually moving from a regulatory clash into a test of how governments interpret financial visibility in the crypto era.
The latest development came as the Central Bank of Nigeria concluded its testimony in an ongoing court case, maintaining that Binance conducted hidden operations within the country without regulatory approval.
The testimony was delivered by Olubukola Akinwunmi, the central bank’s director of banking supervision, before Justice Emeka Nwite at the Federal High Court in Abuja as part of a criminal trial initiated by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission in 2024.
Authorities allege that the exchange and two former executives, Tigran Gambaryan and Nadeem Anjarwalla, conspired to conceal the origin of proceeds tied to activities worth about $35.4 million in Nigeria, actions prosecutors say violate the country’s Money Laundering Act. Binance has denied the accusations and continues to challenge the case.
The central bank’s position rests on how crypto platforms intersect with the banking system. During cross examination, Akinwunmi acknowledged that the exchange was widely accessible and marketed to Nigerian users during the period under review.
At the same time, he argued that platform users’ use of pseudonyms by obscured the visibility of transactions moving through Nigerian financial rails.
This framing reveals the deeper tension behind the dispute. Nigerian regulators are less concerned about the existence of crypto markets and more focused on their ability to trace financial flows.
In conventional banking systems, identity verification sits at the center of regulatory oversight. Crypto platforms often rely on wallet addresses and peer-to-peer marketplaces that separate identity from transaction history, which creates blind spots for authorities trying to monitor capital movement.
That gap has defined Nigeria’s recent policy decisions. In early 2024, the country’s National Security Adviser classified cryptocurrency trading as a national security issue, triggering a broader crackdown that included pressure on fintech firms to block accounts linked to crypto activity.
Around the same time, Binance disabled its peer-to-peer services for Nigerian users after coming under scrutiny for allegations of currency manipulation and money laundering.
The case also became entangled with diplomatic tension when the two Binance executives were detained in Nigeria during the investigation. Anjarwalla later escaped custody, while Gambaryan was eventually released after health concerns and diplomatic discussions.
Viewed from a broader industry perspective, the dispute highlights a shift in how governments are approaching crypto platforms. Early debates focused on whether digital assets should be banned or embraced.
Authorities want exchanges to function like regulated financial institutions, providing transaction records, user identities, and audit trails that match the expectations placed on banks.
Nigeria sits at the center of this debate largely because of its unusually high level of crypto adoption. For years, peer-to-peer trading has doubled as an informal foreign-exchange channel in a country where currency controls shape everyday financial decisions.
Platforms like Binance increasingly became reference points for exchange rates during periods of volatility. That visibility inevitably drew regulatory attention, particularly as authorities moved to stabilize the naira.
The legal case is ongoing, with the next court hearing scheduled for May 15. Meanwhile, other legal battles are happening at the same time, such as tax disputes with the Federal Inland Revenue Service. Despite the tension, both sides have suggested they might be willing to settle the matter outside of court.
This situation highlights a bigger challenge for the crypto industry: as digital platforms grow in emerging markets, they start to impact key parts of the financial system like currency values, banking rules, and national money policies.
Once this impact becomes too large to ignore, regulators naturally step in, and the focus of the conversation changes from encouraging innovation to maintaining control.
Don’t miss important articles during the week. Subscribe to techbuild weekly digest for updates
