The development of digital culture over the previous ten years has fueled the need for greater openness and cooperation, as well as the democratization of public space.
One of the effects of this evolution in our society is the growth of what is known as “civic technology.” These technologies prioritize the needs of the public and attempt to provide them with the resources necessary to participate in a democratic society.
In a society where political elites struggle to uphold their legitimacy and trust, they will be able to achieve this and bring the public conversation back to the concerns of the people.
It should come as no surprise that residents are the main benefactors of civic technology. By assisting individuals in becoming more actively involved in their community, civic technology empowers them.
It contributes to increasing transparency and knowledge of public institutions and how they operate. For instance, exchanging data is one of these methods.
Therefore, civic technology has the potential to significantly increase the number of participants in public decision-making.
Increasing public engagement may be particularly beneficial since it gives governments a better understanding of the needs and wants of their constituents, enabling them to invest in the proper projects.
Governments, rather than individuals, are the main beneficiaries of Gov Tech. Gov Tech seeks to enhance the effectiveness of internal operations in the public sector by digitizing work procedures, whereas Civic Tech focuses on enhancing citizen participation.
Partnerships with Gov Tech start-ups, groups, or private corporations can provide democratic processes with greater vigor and hasten project planning and decision-making.
The time and money that are saved can then be used to fund other endeavors, thereby helping the populace.
Civic tech without Gov tech can result in an imbalance between citizen desire for change and the government’s sluggish response, as we already observed.
The democratic process would be harmed if Gov Tech were implemented without Civic Tech, as major changes to government operations shouldn’t be made without first involving the public and taking into account their requirements.
We can assist governments in striking a healthy and long-lasting balance between legitimacy and effectiveness by using both Civic Tech and Gov Tech as complementing instruments.
Government technology aids in responding more effectively to this input, while civic technology aids in involving citizens in decision-making.
Government technologies are focused on increasing the internal efficiency of the public sector, whereas civic technologies aim to increase individuals’ involvement and interaction in public decision-making.
It’s time for governments to fund Civic Tech initiatives and provide a legislative framework that will allow it to thrive.
Promoting programs that combine Civic and Gov Tech will encourage constructive innovation that can expand citizen participation, improve the capacity of governments to address issues brought up by citizens, and generally improve democratic systems.
Don’t miss important articles during the week. Subscribe to techbuild.africa weekly digest for updates.